Being exposed pornography mixed with violence while being involved in a learning experiment with a female colleague could lead to quite a distress. Sure they could quit, but who likes to be a quitter? Whether they participate because they received something valuable or just because they wanted to help the science in any case they were motivated enough to waste their time, so many of them would continue even if they were not happy about the pornography part.ġ. What did this research actually prove? Only that if you (indirectly) force pornography mixed with violence upon more or less random male students while they believe to participate in a learning experiment they seem to hurt the female colleagues (who are clueless as well) more. If you want to add a statement based on "Report of the Surgeon General's workshop on pornography and public health" you must describe the circumstances. This statement is too broad and as a comment to the text above simply wrong. It seems to be more well updated than the article on lolicon regarding this issue. (And why do you capitalize every word?) - Tsaryu 08:31, 8 November 2006 (UTC) Which law? Which act legal? If you are talking about the HR 4472 thingy: it didnt include lolicon, and if you are talking about the PROTECT ACT: it was ruled unconstitutional, so calm down. You threw "act", "legal" and "law" into one pot and stirred well. This Is Ruining Our Lives, Somebody Must Get This Act Legal, After All, It's Just Fiction! Without Lolicon, This May Get Topsy-turvy For The Anime Fans In The US, And The Net, Where Do We Go As Soon As This Law Is Passed, IRC?!?, Bad Search Sites?!?, Black-Market WWW?!?įrank0115932 01:22, 8 November 2006 (UTC) What. Ashi b aka tock 11:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC) "not related to any other site"? Right. I believe they just stopped paying the hosting bill, and since it's not related to any other site there wasn't anywhere to post a closing announcement. Not4chan shut down because the owners got tired of cleaning up the illegal stuff that was posted there day in and day out.
(I know just as much as has been posted in LAH/renchan/etc.) Zorndyke 11:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC) Regarding the fate of not4chan there are only rumors and I'm not sure if it's a good idea to post rumors in WP. This new US law has nothing to do with lolicon.
except those that have been answered in every forum already. Does anyone know the legal status of lolicon in the US as of Aug 2006? Also, does anyone know the fate of not4chan?( 70.119.80.227 03:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)) There are no stupid questions. Adam Walsh's Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 has also raised the questions and eyebrows of many. With the tragic fall of not4chan, many people are thinking that it is now illegal. Recently, many rumors have reached me about the possible banning of lolicon in the US.
0 kommentar(er)
